Online Stores

Online-Shopping

Home & Garden

home and garden

Health & Beauty

organic-beauty-products

Mother & Baby

baby-organic-products

Animal & Pet Care

natural-pets-product

Food & Wine

organic-food-and-wine

GMO - Genetically Modified Food

GM content in our food, consumer wins and losses, a call to action

index

A letter from our friends at the ACB. For their direct contact details please see the end of the letter. Let us support them in their efforts to make and keep our food safe and GM free!

Dear Consumer,

For the past four years, the ACB has been submitting a number of products for testing to ascertain their GM content as well as to gauge the extent to which food producers are responding to all your wonderful consumer activism and pressure. This year the ACB re-tested 4 popular maize milled products as well as 16 baby and breakfast cereals.

How high is the GM content in our staple foods?

The African Centre for Biosaftery tested for GM ingredients in our staple foods in SA and their findings were disturbing to say the least. We encourage everyone to ask questions and demand answers from companies manufacturing the products we use every day as South Africans. We have the right to know what is in our food!

Permits for the cultivation of GM maize, soya and cotton have been granted in South Africa.

In 2013 it was estimated that 86.6% of South Africa’s maize production was GM. There is no segregation of GM and non-GM maize in storage resulting in comingling and an absence of non-GM maize on the market.

The ACB’s tests for GM in staple foods found the following:

Industry employing bullying tactics to scupper GM food labelling in South Africa

 From our friends at the African Centre for Biosafety (ACB):

The South African government took the deeply controversial decision to permit the genetic modification (GM) of our staple food, maize, in 1997. Three years later they also approved the cultivation of GM soya.
South African consumers have lobbied extensively for the labelling of GM food ever since, while the biotech and food industry have fought aggressively to keep consumers in the dark.

The Consumer Protection Act (CPA) of 2008 requires the mandatory labelling of GM foodstuffs and food producers were lawfully bound to start labelling from October 2011 after regulations to the Act came into force.

MONTSANTO forced to withdraw misleading advertising

FROM THE AFRICAN CENTRE FOR BIOSAFETY

Johannesburg South Africa, 17 March 2014

The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) of South Africa has today ordered Monsanto to withdraw its advertisement on Radio 702 with immediate effect, wherein Monsanto claims the benefits of GM crops. According to ASA, Monsanto’s claims were found to be unsubstantiated and misleading.

The African Centre for Biosafety (ACB) lodged a complaint to the ASA following an advertisement on Radio 702 by Monsanto wherein Monsanto claims that GM crops “enable us to produce more food sustainably whilst using fewer resources; provide a healthier environment by saving on pesticides; decrease greenhouse gas emissions and increase crop yields substantially.” The ACB was supported in its complaint by Ms Judith Taylor from Earthlife Africa.